Score: 10

"nice!"

submission: Super Hero Clock

date: August 11, 2007

this might be the most original Clock movie i've seen since back in the days of The Void.

Score: 5

"an okay effort"

submission: Madness Neurosis Collab

date: August 11, 2007

but I don't know why this was frontpaged. A couple of the sequences were pretty smooth but overall this flash was mediocre and painfully shaky. And yes, the poor spelling in the intro also detracted from it's overall appeal.

Madness should be left to Krinkels, frankly.

Score: 3

"Meh."

submission: Reiko - Captive Audience

date: May 5, 2007

I do see potential in this character as far as flash, but this particular escapade fell flat for a few reasons.

1) Length. Yes, I know it's supposed to be a short gag, the equivalent to an animated one-liner. But the pacing of the buildup and the actual gag (which I'm sorry, was a weak punchline..) was frankly, a bit lacking. Then again, that particular joke is kind of hard to pace well, and probably would've served better as a one-shot strip.

2) Animation. Admittedly, this is a slight step up from Foamy in that there was a tiny bit of animation, even if it was just limited to one repeating symbol of flowing hair. Personally I'd look into finding someone else to do your toons, if you do more.

3) Disproportionate attention. Had IWP not been credited this would've been another mediocre flash to pass the the portal, get a few chuckles, and have a peaceful if slightly unviewed existance. But putting his name on it thrust you into a limelight that was not needed and thus tossed you to the wolves. Getting front page was the worst thing that could've happened to this from a feedback point of view, though it is good advertising for your site.

I know you're going to receive a billion reviews on this insulting illwillpress so I'm really not trying to add to them, but honestly, if you're looking to make a cartoon series, I'd look into someone that can do more than a few basic, repeating tweens. Don't let someone else sink your ship.

Score: 9

"Great, as usual."

submission: CU-4th Of July Special 06

date: July 4, 2006

However, I really do want to know why a stormtrooper would say "May the Force be with you."

Score: 6

"Really good sprite animation"

submission: sf training

date: May 11, 2006

However, your captioning needs a lot of work, both in spelling and blending into the style you used for the reast of the flash.

A decent first effort though, I must say.

Score: 0

"Newgrounds is a flash site."

submission: Akira Tribute AMV

date: May 11, 2006

This is not flash. It may have been converted into an swf file, but it was not made or animated in flash. It is a video. This is not a video site, keep shit like this off of it.

Also, Linkin Park sucks.

Score: 2

"Well."

submission: Defend Ur API

date: May 11, 2006

One one hand, the game runs smoothly and the engine clearly works well.

On the other hand, it's bland, it's dull, it's boring, really.

Try doing this:
a) moving the cannon out of the corner,
b) sprucing it up with some more indepth visuals/sound effects

Do the both of these, and you should have a winner on your hands.

Score: 8

"I am torn."

submission: The People's Mario

date: April 27, 2006

On one hand, you're quite an animator. On the other hand, you're making Mario flash. Something which quite frankly, has been done to death, and cannot possibly have a new spin put on it. This was the only thing that hurt you stylewise.

Your art is solid, as is your animation and use of sound. I look forward to seeing more works from you, because I refuse to let this one thing stand as my lasting impression of your flashwork.

Score: 8

"Amusing, but musically inaccurate."

submission: Kill the Emo

date: April 23, 2006

Then again, most "emo kids" don't even know what emo is, so that's forgiveable in this instance, since it was infact, mocking them.

The "I've had worse" bits made me laugh, and frankly, the only thing holding this back was the low-caliber art, which still worked fairly well for the style.

Score: 3

"well.."

submission: PwnerShip

date: March 31, 2006

This had potential. The art was good, and the fairly blatant foamy parody character amused me.. But this was mostly just a slideshow with very minor tweens going on.

Then, the obligatory gay joke kicked in, and there was actual animating.. But it wasn't very good, or very amusing.

If you could make an actual movie out of the idea, it'd be a lot funnier. But you definately layed out a good outline.